Stress as well as the Work-Life Balance
All people experience stressful events during their lives ranging from slight to severe. Theories of management and organizational habit recognize the impact of tension on individuals personal and work lives. Stress can easily have severe consequences pertaining to both individuals and companies. Thus, many organizations are implementing ways to reduce the negative impacts of stress to benefit all their employees and also to promote the achievements of the organization total. The Nature of Pressure and Individual Differences
Stress can be defined as stress in the body and mind due to emotional, mental and physical factors. In addition , stress can be experienced since both an opportunity and a threat. The opportunity can yield a positive final result while a threat might most likely deliver a negative final result. If an person is reduced in self efficiency, than the opportunity can actually trigger stress to get an individual. Lots of the things people encounter on a regular basis can be perceived as either options or dangers but generally only the crucial ones bring about stress. The personalities and abilities play important roles in how each people individually handles stress. Based on the Journal of Applied Mindset, a person with a dangerous of neuroticism will usually view themselves, their agencies, their careers and the people they work with in a bad manner (pp. 402-412). However, employees that are high on visibility to experience could find risk currently taking and recurrent change less stressful than those individuals low on visibility to experience. Additionally , Type A personalities have very different stress levels than those who would be considered Type B's. Type A's have a very good desire to achieve and therefore are competitive, have a sense of urgency, happen to be impatient, and is hostile. Consequently , Type A's usually encounter higher levels of stress than Type B's who tend to be more laid back and straightforward going. Furthermore to having diverse personalities, workers who vary in their capabilities, will also experience different degrees of stress. By giving employees with appropriate numbers of training, it can increase employee's skills and tends to lead to higher levels of self-efficacy. Implications of Pressure
The consequences of stress can range from moderate to serious and there are three different types of consequences which include physical, psychological and behavioral. Physiological stress range from sweaty hands, inability to rest, a beating heart, elevated blood pressure, head aches and even even worse heart attacks. According to D. Watson and M. W. Pennebaker, in the document Health Issues, Stress, and Distress: Going through the Central Function of Bad Affectivity, that they point out the fact that relationship between stress and a physiological consequence is definitely complicated, and researchers are still struggling to know the characteristics involved (pp. 234-254). The most serious effects of pressure are efficiently correlated to the individual being subjected to a long time periods of stress and can include high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and heart attacks, with differences of symptoms and complaints starting between several individuals. The other type of result is emotional stress which is the experience of stress filled feelings and emotions. These emotions consist of being in a bad mood, sense anxious, bothered, upset, furious, bitter and hostile. Any or all of these feeling will detract from employees' overall health and wellness (Tellegen, 1985). Highly stressed employees tend to have a more negative perception with their jobs and organizations and are more likely to possess low levels of job fulfillment and company commitment, as a result decreasing the general efficiency of the organization. Stressed employees can also be susceptible to feeling underappreciated; having a lack of control and even sense that all their work related stress is interfering with the...
Cited: 1) 60minutes. (2007). YouTube. Retrieved from Community 's Ideal Employer BARRIERE Video Data file: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SCxJTmS1Eo
2) Atieh, A
3) Cericola, S. A. (2000). Time and Stress Management Approaches. Plastic Surgical Nursing 20(1), 48-49.
4) Cole, Sumado a. (March/April 2003). Work-Life in a Down Economy: Morale Increase or Earnings Flush? ". DiversityInc, 96-101.
5) Costigan, J. (2013, March 20). ForbesCustom. com. Retrieved March 19, 2013, from Human Capital Supervision: http://www.forbescustom.com/HCMPgs/HCMBenefitsP1.html
6) Guimaraes, Meters
7) Kaplan, D. (2013, March 9). Best Firms to Be employed by 2010. Recovered from CNN Money: http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/21/technology/
8) Kleiner, S. Um. (2003). New Developments in Managing Task Related Anxiety. Equal Options International 22(5), 64-70.
9) M. J. Burke, A. B. (1993). The Part of Unfavorable Affectivity in Understanding Relations Between Self-Reports of Stressors and Strains: A Comment on the Applied Psychology Literature. Journal of Utilized Psychology 78, 402-412.
10) Matzo, Meters. (2009). Music and Pressure Reduction. The American Record of Nursing Vol. 109, 40.
11) Millions, T. (2012). Bypassing Stones. Tension 24(5), thirty-one.
12) Moran, G. (2013, March 9). The Concealed Costs of Employee Turnover. Retrieved via Entreprernue: http://www.entrepreneur.com/
13) Pennebaker, D
14) Ryall, J. (2003, June 15). Bad Careers Are a Trouble Europe Vast. Retrieved via Scotland on Sunday: www.scotlandonsunday.com
16) BARRIERE Corporate Tradition. (2013, March). Retrieved from SAS Company: website: http://www.sas.com/company/about/culture/index.html
17) SAS. com
18) Jeff L. Boyar, C. P. (July 2005). The Effects of Work-Life Conflict on Nonattendance Actions. Journal of Business Analysis 58, 919-925.
19) Tellegen, D. Watts. (1985). Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood. Emotional Bulletin 98, 219-235.
20) Westbrook, P. K. (March 1999). Comparing Employees in Traditional Work Structure vs . Telecommuting Jobs Using Herzberg 's Hygienes and Motivators. Engineering Supervision Journal, 15-20.
21) Wood, S. At the. (2004). Sherlock holmes and Rahe 's Interpersonal Readjustment Ranking Scale. In S. Electronic. Wood, Learning the World of Mindset (pp. 288-289). Boston: Pearson Education.