Cognitive-Behavioral Remedy and Motivational Interviewing Leigh Lusignan
CPSY 6728-4 Substance Abuse Counseling
Facilitator: Dr . Natalie Spencer
Come july 1st 23, 2014
Week eight Discussion one particular
Intellectual Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to Motivational Meeting with (MI) Today, I will present the assessment between Intellectual Behavioral Remedy (CBT) and Motivational Interviewing (MI). The similarities and differences will be addressed with regards to techniques and/or methods. In addition , I will describe how CBT and MI are used on the case study selected (i. e., Jack) a heterosexual male of 64 years old whom just lately chose to seek out therapy regarding his substance abuse of alcoholic beverages. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
According to Stevens and Smith (2013) CBT and MI can be applied for substance abuse therapy. You will discover similarities and differences between your two; nevertheless I will give a rationale intended for combining these kinds of models. Jack's cognitive disability is in his decision-making (e. g., having although the doctor advises he or she must quit to get his health). I believe CBT would assist Jack in self-efficacy (i. e., Jack's believe in his ability to flourish in specific situations). The beneficial relationship is crucial as mentioned earlier on in other articles. CBT is going to challenge Jack's life goals and offer him encouragement so he can develop a sense of belonging. Jack port will execute self-exploration so that he can recognize that this individual has been blocking his own growth and denying himself the areas of self-efficacy (as cited in Miller, 2005). According to Corey (2013), this approach is usually time-limited which will focuses on particular problems (e. g., alcoholism). However , that leads to modest insight and modification in behavior. The consumer will explore his thoughts, share his feelings, and apply it to his socialization (Corey, 2013). Motivational Meeting with (MI)
Material use concerns such as alcohol dependency require MI because it is not driven simply by theory or perhaps model; yet , it does give attention to building client motivation and responsibility concerning change (Stevens & Cruz, 2013). The clinician provides guidance and support whilst no particular assumptions will probably be made relating to course of treatment. I would personally begin my therapy with Jack whilst respecting his independence. Stevens and Cruz (2013) mentioned, " MI is a humanistic, client focused counseling approach” (p. 191). This quick intervention can elicit tendencies change in Plug so they can explore and resolve his ambivalence (as cited in Rollnick & Miller, 1995, p. 326; Stevens & Smith, 2013, p. 191). For instance, I would really prefer to explore Jack's point of view wonderful emotional reactions (e.., obstacles) as a result of his probable undiagnosed Posttraumatic Anxiety Disorder (PTSD) and current disorder within military staff. Betty plus the doctor encouraged Jack that he has to stop ingesting and I wish to elicit Jack's reasons to decrease his intake of liquor. However , Plug must invest in this specific transform. Similarities and differences
The similarities between CBT and MI stress client activity outside meetings; provide support for self-efficacy, and motivate Jack and so he will be aware of his own potential. Common factors are distributed within the healing relationship responding to empathy and collaboration (Stevens & Jones, 2013).
Right after between CBT and MI are inside the philosophy. For example, CBT build skills although MI develops motivation. CBT is educative whereas MI is evocative (i. e., bringing good memories and/or feelings to mind). In CBT Plug solutions will probably be preselected whereas MI enables the client to select solutions pertaining to himself. CBT is also depending on empirical support for group format although MI is definitely briefer offer strategies for consumer resistance (Stevens & Cruz, 2013). On the other hand, I would like to provide a rationale pertaining to combining tactics. CBT provides structure for treatment which can be done in groups which is not successful without Plug...
References: Stevens, P., & Smith, Ur. L. (2013). Substance Abuse Therapies Theory and Practice (5th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.